NettetMaterials produced by the Joint Indian Reserve Commission and Indian Reserve Commission, 1876-1910. About the Collection. Description of Materials Summary by … Nettet31. mar. 2014 · In this decision the Specific Claims Tribunal found that the Williams Lake Indian Band was wrongfully dispossessed of its village lands in Williams Lake in the 19th century, and that Canada was accountable for the Colony’s failure to protect the Band’s village lands from settlers.. The Band had brought the claim under s. 14(1)(b) and s. …

Peter O’Reilly Federal and Provincial Collections of …

NettetThe Joint/Indian Reserve Commission (J/IRC) (1876-1878 and 1878-1910) designated certain reserves as shared reserves to be used by two or more bands. They were … Nettetthe requirement that land be set aside for the Indian Nations. In the result, Canada and British Columbia approved, by Executive Orders, the establishment of the Joint Indian Reserve Commission (“JIRC”). The Memorandum attached to the Governor in Council's approval on November 10, 1875 provided, in part: ayia napa aktivitäten

Derivatives Clearing Organization Risk Management Regulations …

Netteticy of placing Indians on reserves so small they could not earn a living, and the jurisdictional disputes between the dominion and provincial governments re-sulted in … NettetIn 1876 he returned to BC where he became the third member, representing both governments, of the Joint Indian Reserve Commission (JIRC). He completed two circuits with the JIRC before the commission was reduced and he was named as the sole commissioner in 1877. Nettet1. jan. 2003 · 5 The Joint Indian Reserve Commission, 1876-78. 6 Sproat and the Native Voice, 1878-80. Part 3: Filling in the Map. 7 O’Reilly, Bureaucracy, and Reserves, 1880-98. 8 Imposing a Solution, 1898-1938. Part 4: Land and Livelihood. 9 Native Space. 10 Towards a Postcolonial Land Policy. ayhan kufstein